A direct index is an index fund, unbundled.

Own an S&P 500 index fund and you hold a single ticker — one share of a pool that owns the 500 companies for you. Direct indexing holds those same 500 stocks directly, in your name, each with its own cost basis. Same index, just unbundled into the companies behind it.

Hold the companies directly and you can start changing which ones you hold: skip your employer's stock, harvest the losers and replace them with something close, tilt toward the sectors and factors you have a view on. The moment you intentionally deviate from the index, direct indexing becomes custom indexing. And it exists on a spectrum that runs from a single exclusion (e.g., your employer) to a portfolio shaped around your factors, your values, and your whole tax picture.

That last part is the custom part. It’s the only kind we run.

// FIRST - THE BASICS

What direct indexing is, and the problem it solves.

What direct indexing is, and the problem it solves.

01

01

01

Direct indexing is an investment strategy that replicates a market index — like the S&P 500, or a total-market benchmark — by owning its underlying stocks individually rather than through a mutual fund or ETF. The return profile aims to track the index. The tax profile is where everything changes.

Inside a fund wrapper, like an ETF, the individual stocks are invisible to your tax return. The ETF nets winners against losers internally, and you own one position with one cost basis. When the index is up, there is nothing to harvest — even though, in most years, dozens of the stocks inside it finished down.

Held directly, each stock keeps its own tax identity. The ones that dip can be sold, their losses captured, and similar exposure bought back — so the portfolio keeps tracking the index while the losses go to work against gains elsewhere in your financial life.

// THE WRAPPER

In an ETF

One position, one cost basis. Every stock’s move is packed inside — you can’t see or act on any single one.

📦

1 ETF · 1 COST BASIS

A stock drops below cost? Netted away. Nothing reaches your tax return.

// HELD DIRECTLY

Direct indexing

You own each stock. Winners track the index; losers become harvest candidates — framed in green.

AAPL

▲ +1.8%

MSFT

▲ +0.9%

NVDA

▼ −2.1%

AMZN

▲ +2.4%

META

▲ +1.1%

GOOG

▲ +0.6%

BRK

▲ +0.3%

JPM

▼ −1.4%

V

▲ +0.8%

MA

▲ +1.5%

LLY

▲ +3.2%

UNH

▼ −4.0%

HD

▼ −0.7%

PG

▲ +0.4%

COST

▲ +1.9%

NFLX

▼ −3.1%

KO

▲ +0.2%

CVX

▲ +1.2%

WMT

▲ +0.5%

DIS

▼ −2.6%

Up — tracking

Down — book the loss

Sell the loser, book the loss, buy a close substitute. The loss offsets gains elsewhere — your index exposure never breaks.

Illustrative. Each square represents an individually held stock; in any given year some positions trade below cost even when the index rises. Wrapper funds net these losses internally; direct ownership keeps them usable.

1.08%

Average annual tax alpha over a buy-and-hold portfolio, 1926–2018

22.4%

Compound annual growth in direct indexing assets, 2021–2024

24 of 24

Calendar years since 2001 in which some S&P 500 stocks lost value — including strong up years

Sources: Tax-loss-harvesting alpha from Chaudhuri, Burnham & Lo, “An Empirical Evaluation of Tax-Loss-Harvesting Alpha,” Financial Analysts Journal, 2020; Cerulli Associates, December 2025, as reported in Nuveen, “Harness the benefits of tax-advantaged SMA solutions,” January 2026; S&P Global data 2001–2025, as presented in Nuveen, “Tax-loss harvesting: upgrade portfolios amidst volatility,” Exhibit 2.

// THE ENGINE

Losses you can actually use, even in up years.

Losses you can actually use, even in up years.

02

02

02

Tax-loss harvesting is the practice of selling positions that have declined, capturing the loss for tax purposes, and replacing them with similar exposure so the portfolio stays on plan. A direct index runs this at the individual-security level, all year — not as a December cleanup.

The index being up tells you almost nothing about the stocks inside it. In every calendar year from 2001 through 2024, some S&P 500 constituents lost value — including years when the index itself rose more than 20%. A direct index is built to notice, harvest, and move on while staying invested.

Those harvested losses can offset realized gains elsewhere — including the gains created when selling down a concentrated stock position. That is why this page lives inside our concentrated-positions playbook: the index does the diversifying, and its losses may help pay the tax bill of getting there.

One framing matters more than any mechanic: the value here is measured after tax. A direct index isn’t trying to outguess the market — the potential benefit is what some call tax alpha, not market-beating returns.

Anyone can buy the index.
The question is — "what version of the index is best for you?"

Anyone can buy the index.
The question is — "what version of the index is best for you?"

Anyone can buy the index.
The question is — "what version of the index is best for you?"

// THE CUSTOM PART

Custom direct indexing: an index with a point of view.

Custom direct indexing: an index with a point of view.

03

03

03

Custom direct indexing starts from the same chassis — individually held stocks tracking an index — and then tunes it: factor tilts (deliberately leaning toward characteristics like momentum, value, or quality that academic research has associated with long-run return differences), regional and sector weights, exclusions, and tax constraints specific to your situation.

Plain direct indexing has become genuinely good and genuinely cheap — robo-advisors run it well at scale. If automated harvesting at default index weights were all a portfolio needed, most of our clients could set that up themselves in an afternoon. They come to us for the version that carries an outlook.

The tuning can also subtract. If your net worth already leans hard on one company — like the one you work at — a custom index can exclude that stock and its closest peers, so your diversification engine isn’t quietly re-buying the risk you hired it to reduce.

Direct indexing vs. custom direct indexing

Direct indexing
Custom direct indexing

What you own

Individual stocks tracking an index at its default weights

Individual stocks tracking an index, weighted to an outlook

Index weights

The benchmark’s defaults

Tilted — by factor, region, or sector — to reflect a documented market view

Tax-loss harvesting

Automated, at the security level

Security-level, coordinated with your wider tax picture — concentrated sell-downs, capital-gains budgets, charitable plans

Exclusions

Standard screening options

Built around you — starting with the stock you already earn at work

Funding

Typically cash

Cash or existing holdings in kind, transitioned against a pre-set capital-gains budget

Who decides

An algorithm’s defaults

An advisory team accountable for the outlook

Capabilities vary by provider; this comparison describes how we use the tool, not a claim about any specific platform.

// ASSESSING FIT

When we reach for it — and when we don’t.

When we reach for it — and when we don’t.

04

04

04

Custom direct indexing tends to fit investors with a sizable taxable account, meaningful realized or expected capital gains, and a plan to keep adding to the portfolio. The signals we look for:

A taxable account doing real work. The strategy’s engine is tax treatment — it only matters where taxes apply. The larger the taxable portfolio, the more the security-level machinery has to work with.

Gains worth offsetting. Harvested losses need a job. Selling down a concentrated position, a windfall, an equity-heavy compensation year — these create the gains a direct index may help absorb.

An existing portfolio that’s hard to exit. Appreciated holdings can fund the index in kind, with sales paced against a pre-set capital-gains budget — a managed transition rather than a one-day tax event.

Ongoing savings. Regular contributions keep the engine supplied with fresh tax lots. More on why that matters below — it’s the part most providers skip at the demo.

Minimums apply — meaningfully lower than our long/short portfolios, but real. And when there are no realized gains to offset and none on the horizon, the harvesting engine has nothing to work against; a simpler portfolio may serve better. Knowing when not to deploy a strategy is part of the strategy.

// KEEPING IT ALIVE

Why a direct (or custom) index needs feeding.

Why a direct (or custom) index needs feeding.

05

05

05

Ossification is what happens to a direct index that stops receiving new money: as positions appreciate and losses get harvested, fewer and fewer lots remain below cost, and the harvesting engine gradually winds down.

The mechanics are unglamorous but worth understanding. Every harvested loss lowers the replacement position’s cost basis — harvesting defers tax, it doesn’t erase it. Over time, a portfolio left alone ages into a block of appreciated lots with little left to harvest. The first years are typically the richest; an unfed index drifts toward being an ordinary index portfolio with extra line items.

The treatment is replenishment. New contributions buy new lots at today’s prices — fresh raw material for future harvests. This is why we’d rather see a steady savings rate flowing into a custom index than a lump sum left to fossilize. And the aged, low-basis lots aren’t dead weight: they may become candidates for charitable gifts or simply long-term holdings whose tax bill stays deferred.

// REPLENISHED — THE ENGINE KEEPS RUNNING

New savings flow in

Each contribution adds tax lots at current prices.

Dips get harvested

Fresh lots are the most likely to trade below cost.

Losses stay useful

Available against gains, year after year.

// UNFED — THE ENGINE WINDS DOWN

No new lots

The portfolio holds only aging positions.

Lots appreciate past cost

Harvesting lowered basis; markets did the rest.

Little left to harvest

The index ossifies into a static appreciated block.

Conceptual illustration of how harvesting capacity tends to evolve with and without ongoing contributions. Actual results vary with market conditions, contribution timing, and individual tax circumstances.

See whether a custom direct index fits your situation.

See whether a custom direct index fits your situation.

One conversation. We’ll look at your taxable accounts, your embedded gains, and whether the engine would actually have work to do. If it wouldn’t, we’ll tell you that too.

// FAQ

Questions we hear about direct indexing.

Questions we hear about direct indexing.

What is direct indexing?

How is direct indexing different from an index fund or ETF?

How does tax-loss harvesting work in a direct-indexed portfolio?

Who benefits most from direct indexing?

What are the trade-offs to know about?

7724 35th Ave NE #15170

Seattle, WA 98115-9955

(971) 716-1991

hello@prosperowealth.com

Prospero Wealth, LLC is an Investment Adviser registered with the SEC, principally located in the state of Washington. All views, expressions, and opinions included in this communication are subject to change.

The information on this site is not intended as tax, accounting or legal advice, nor is it an offer or solicitation to buy or sell, or as an endorsement of any company, security, fund, or other offering. Information provided should not be solely relied upon for decision making. Please consult your legal, tax, or accounting professional regarding your specific situation. Investments involve risk and have the potential for complete loss. It should not be assumed that any recommendations made will necessarily be profitable.

The information on this site is provided “AS IS” and without warranties either express or implied and the information may not be free from error. Your use of the information provided is at your sole risk.

© Prospero Wealth 2026. All rights reserved.